You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. And it’s a good thing since it is at very low levels in the atmosphere. Happer then showed a picture of polluted air in China with the caption: “Real pollution in Shanghai.” “If you can see it, it’s not CO2,” Happer said. “We know for absolute certain that carbon dioxide is the stuff of life, the foundation for life on earth,” Moore said.
: 'Demonization of CO2 is irrational at best and even modest warming is mostly beneficial.' - 'When someone says this is the warmest temperature on record. You are calling something a pollutant that we all produce. ' AUSTIN, Texas – A team of prominent scientists gathered in Texas today at a climate summit to declare that fears of man-made global warming were “irrational” and “based on nonsense” that “had nothing to do with science.” They warned that “we are being led down a false path” by the upcoming UN climate summit in Paris.
This is a very tiny change period.' : 'Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense. To call carbon dioxide a pollutant is really Orwellian.
“When someone points to this and says this is the warmest temperature on record. If you can adjust temperatures to 2/10ths of a degree, it means it wasn’t certain to 2/10ths of a degree,” he said.
() “The UN IPCC wisely avoided making the claim that 51% of a small change in temperature constitutes a problem.
Social groups can be very small—from just a few friends—to very large, e.g., millions of people who frequent a website.
Slang is usually considered informal, and thus is common in speech but not in writing (unless that writing is texting or internet chatting).To state that climate change will be ‘catastrophic’ hides a cascade of value-laden assumptions which do not emerge from empirical or theoretical science,” Hulme wrote.Lindzen singled out Secretary of State John Kerry for his ‘ignorance’ on science. “Kerry expresses his ignorance of what science is,” he added.Lindzen also criticized EPA Chief Gina Mc Carthy’s education: “I don’t want to be snobbish, but U Mass Boston is not a very good school,” he said to laughter.Lindzen concluded his talk by saying: “Learn how to identify claims that have no alarming implications and free to say ‘So what? Will Happer, who has authored over 200 peer-reviewed papers, called policies to reduce CO2 “based on nonsense.” “Policies to slow CO2 emissions are really based on nonsense.The scientists appeared at a climate summit sponsored by the Texas Public Policy Foundation.